Thursday, March 17, 2011

SRIA/SRICF: Secret Chiefs or Golden Dawn Impostors?



Golden Dawn Impostor
SRICF Supreme Magus, William Koon II
In August, 2010, the Supreme Magus of the Masonic SRICF, William Koon II, astonished Masonic Rosicrucians gathered at Golden State College, S.R.I.C.F at the Los Altos Masonic Temple in Los Altos, California. Golden Dawn members in attendance nearly spewed their coffee across the room with laughter. 
Golden Dawn members could not believe their ears when Koon made claims implying that  the SRICF in America and the SRIA in England have the right to designate which Golden Dawn order is the "official" Golden Dawn - implying that Masonic Rosicrucians have governing authority over the Golden Dawn.
Let us give Mr. Koon the benefit of the doubt - and assume he is not suffering from delusions of grandeur. We have, after all, entire asylums in California already filled to overflowing with Jesus, Napolean, Hitler and Elvis wannabees.
It is clear, however, from the above statements that both the SRICF and Mr. Kuhn remain horribly ignorant about the true nature and history of the Golden Dawn. To begin with, the Golden Dawn is not at all a masonic order. Secondly, the Golden Dawn was not created by the SRIA. Moreover, Bill Koon and SRIA Supreme Magus, John Paternoster, are not Secret Chiefs of the Golden Dawn. Finally, at no time in history have either the SRIA or the SRICF ever had any sort of governing authority over the Golden Dawn.
Alleged Golden Dawn Impostor
SRIA Supreme Magus, John R. Paternoster
In fact, strong evidence exists that in the early years of the Golden Dawn, the SRIA actually attempted to steal the Golden Dawn's Rosicrucian lineage. Here is the astonishing story of how that happened.
The Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia (SRIA) originated in Edinburgh on December 31, 1866, when Robert Wentworth Little (1840-1878) and William Haughan were initiated into a Rosicrucian Society in Scotland. This society was based on an earlier Rosicrucian society in England about which little is known, except that it is likely of Britanic origin and that the ritual they used had no relationship to the Gold und Rosenkreutz Order in Germany.
The reliability of the SRIA possessing any sort of legitimate Rosicrucian affiliation has been seriously compromised by two false stories about its origins historically propagated by the society. According to the first story: "An 18th century Italian Ambassador came to England who possessed certain Rosicrucian secrets, the authority to confer grades and to pass on to disciples that authority. Among the last of those disciples was Grand Secretary, W.H. White. White initiated R.W. Little into the secrets of the fraternity and gave him the authority to recruit others. Little later found some Rosicrucian papers in the cellar of Freemasons' Hall which became the ritual of SRIA."
A version of this story was deliberately propagated by the society with the knowledge of the High Council, when W. Wynn Wescott published it in "The Historical Notes of the SRIA." The only proof of this story cited by Wescott was the first page of a letter written by Grand Chaplain of the Grand Lodge of England, T.F. Ravenshaw.
This story was later proven to be false and every shred of evidence refuted in a paper by Freemasonic researcher Bruce Wilson in 1947. The aforementioned letter had been published by Wescott in incomplete form, for example. Bruce Wilson found and published the entire letter, the second page of which clearly demonstrated that it had nothing whatsoever to do with the SRIA, but rather with the Red Cross of Constantine.
The second story concerned Kenneth MacKenzie (1833-1886) and was first circulated in 1892. The story alleged that: "MacKenzie had early in his life been the tutor of Count Apponyi in Austria, where he was initiated into certain Hermetic and Rosicrucian lineages. He was further given the authority to establish a Rosicrucian society in England, which he then communicated to Little." 
MacKenzie was listed as a Past Magus of the SRIA on a leaflet stating the aims of the society in 1892, signed by then Secretary General W.J. Ferguson. The attempt to posthumously frame MacKenzie as the founder of the society, and thus claim for the SRIA an affiliation deriving from the Fraternitas Aureae et Rosae Crucis in Continental Europe, reached new depths of depravity when even the original Society register was altered. MacKenzie's name originally stood as number 114. This was altered to 0. 
This story was also refuted and the relevant forgeries exposed by Bruce Wilson. Wilson also explained how the fiction of MacKenzie as the founder of SIRA was quickly dropped, but survived in a modified form wherein MacKenzie was said to have unofficially helped Little in founding the order in 1865.
In his 1947 paper, "The Origin of our Rosicrucian Society," Wilson reveals an astonishing discovery. It turns out that Kenneth MacKenzie actually had been initiated into a Rosicrucian society and had indeed received a warrant from Count Apponyi. Furthermore, MacKenzie did actually use this warrant to found a Rosicrucian organization, but it was not the SRIA! Wilson reveals that the warranted organization was none other than the first phase of the Golden Dawn, as a branch of a Continental society called the Brothers of Light. 
This is a reference to the Order of the Asiatic Brethren (also called the Ritter und Bruder des Lichts or Knights and Brothers of Light).The Asiatic Brethren was a schismatic Rosicrucian order founded in 1780 by then member of the Gold und Rosenkreutz order Hans Heinrich von Ecker und Eckhoffen (1750-1790). Interestingly, the Asiatic Brethren was a Rosicrucian order which allowed Jews among its members at a time that antisemitism was rampant in Germany. Among its Jewish members figured prominent Qabalists from the heretical sect of Sabatai Zevi such as Ephraim Hirschfeld (?- 1819) and Thomas von Schonfeld (whose real name was Moses Dobrucshka). 
Thus the order of the Asiatic Brethren appears to hold a unique place in the history of the Rosicrucian tradition, as having fully developed its Qabalistic aspect for the first time. Interestingly, the Sabataian Qabalah of the Asiatic Brethren is of exactly the same nature as that later found in the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn.
Bruce Wilson, in his revolutionary paper, goes on to explain that two temples of "Brothers of Light" were founded in England (Hermanoubis Temple N 2 was in Bristol under F.G. Irwin), but that they waited in vain for the rituals which were never completed. This explains why, when the triad of Woodman, MacGregor Mathers, and Westcott was completed, the Isis-Urania Temple was numbered as Temple N 3, since it was originally envisioned as a continuation of the first phase of the Golden Dawn. This likely also explains the origins of the mysterious "cypher manuscripts," which later fell into the hands of Wescott and eventually became the rituals of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. The cypher manuscripts were certainly the skeletal formula for the rituals of the society created by Kenneth MacKenzie to receive the Apponyi Rosicrucian affiliation and transmission.
A number of scholars have speculated whether or not there might have been an historical relationship between the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn and the "Lodge zur goldenen Morgonrthe" in Frankfurt am Main. Recent research by Rosicrucian scholar Jean-Pascal Ruggiu (present Imperator of the Ahathor Temple N 7 of the Golden Dawn in Paris) has confirmed that this is indeed the case. Once again, the point of connection is the Order of the Asiatic Brethren. Ruggiu has confirmed that the Lodge zur goldenen Morgonrthe in 1807 became the refuge for many of its Jewish brethren when the Order of the Asiatic Brethren fell into abeyance.
Bruce Wilson's landmark study today raises as many questions as it made revelations in 1947. First of all, why would W. Wynn Wescott attempt to appropriate for the SRIA the Rosicrucian affiliation given by Kenneth MacKenzie to the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn? In the process Wescott caused great harm to both societies, creating falsehoods and illusions about their origins while depriving the Golden Dawn of its rightful heritage.
Secondly, why did the information contained in Wilson's 1947 paper not become common public knowledge prior to this present writing? In fact, when mention was first made of the Wilson paper in the third edition of SRICF (the American version of SRIA) researcher Harold Voorhis' book, A History of Organized Masonic Rosicrucianism, the SRIA broke off all relations with SRICF due to this incident for several years. Why did the SRIA behave in this odd way?
Finally, one must note that the most widely published researcher of the history the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, R.A. Gilbert, is also a high ranking member of SRIA. Why is it in his thorough study of the history of this Hermetic Order, "The Golden Dawn, Twilight of the Magicians," Gilbert merely quotes "en passant" Wescott's recounting of the origins of the SRIA, with no mention whatsoever that these stories, together with the alleged Rosicrucian affiliation of the SRIA, have been thoroughly discredited? 
Indeed, why is there no mention whatsoever of Bruce Wilson's research, essential to an understanding of the Rosicrucian affiliation of the Golden Dawn, in any of Gilbert's publicly published works? Gilbert certainly must have been aware of Wilson's research. All of these things taken together give a compelling impression of an attempt to suppress the information revealed by Bruce Wilson's research, while maintaining a public illusion of an SRIA Rosicrucian affiliation and concealing the Golden Dawn's true and rightful Rosicrucian heritage through Kenneth MacKenzie.
So, we see that the recent bizarre incident involving SRICF's Bill Koon, is just the latest in a series of incidents wherein Masonic "Rosicrucians" have attempted to hijack the authorities of the Golden Dawn. The truth remains, nonetheless, that the Golden Dawn was not created by the SRIA. Due to all of the above, it remains extremely questionable, in fact, if the SRIA or any of the other Masonic "Rosicrucian" bodies are really Rosicrucian at all - at least in more than in name only. 
All along, due to its dubious origins and questionable (if not non-existant) Rosicrucian lineage, it has been the SRIA that, from the beginning, has been covetous of the Hermetic and Rosicrucian lineages of the Golden Dawn - and not the other way around. 
In fact, truth be told, the real reason for last Summer's latest attempted power grab, is likely because the SRIA has become aware that the HOGD/AO has recovered the complete, original Golden Dawn lineages from Continental Europe, where the true Secret Chiefs of the Third Order have always been and still remain. On the other hand, the so-called Rosicrucian Masonic research bodies, today appear to have become not merely "Rosicrucian" impostors -  but also Golden Dawn "Secret Chief" impostors.
Thieving Klingon bastards!

14 comments:

  1. I noticed that you don't list your sources, which appears to be taken from the book "The Origins of the Rosicrucian Society in England."
    http://www.goldendawntrust.com/Product-SRIA_51.aspx

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you, Darcy!

    Actually what I have published here is a variation of a paper that I originally wrote in 1999. I had no idea that you had published Bruce Wilson's paper in paperback form since then. When I originally wrote the article, all I had to go by were rather bad photocopies of photocopies of Wilson's series of papers. You have done the Golden Dawn community a great service by publishing this book. Bravo!

    I wholeheartedly recommend this book to all scholars who have more than a passing effort in Golden Dawn history. One important question, Darcy. My copy appeared to be missing one chapter from the original series of papers. Were you able to publish this book from the complete manuscript? I just ordered a copy in any case. I am absolutely DYING to see what is in the missing chapter!

    Fraternally,
    David Griffin

    ReplyDelete
  3. Defamation, Libel, and Slander
    Share

    * Twitter
    * Gmail
    * Blogger
    * Buzz
    * Orkut
    * Google Reader
    * Bookmarks
    * » More

    Comment Print

    Google does not remove allegedly defamatory content from www.google.com or any other U.S. dot com domains.

    US domain sites such as Google.com, Blogger, Page Creator, etc. are sites regulated only by U.S. law. Given this fact, and pursuant to Section 230(c) of the Communications Decency Act, we do not remove allegedly defamatory material from U.S. domains. The only exception to this rule is if the material has been found to be defamatory by a court, as evidenced by a court order.

    The language of Section 230(c) of the Communications Decency Act fundamentally states that Internet services like Google.com, Blogger and many of Google's other services are republishers and not the publisher of that content. Therefore, these sites are not held liable for any allegedly defamatory, offensive or harassing content published on the site.

    Please note that Blogger does not remove blogs for containing insults or negative commentary. While blogs that contain such content can be distasteful, Blogger is not in a position to arbitrate disputes.

    ReplyDelete
  4. One correction---MacKenzie died in 1886 (not 1866.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @ Care et VH Morgan,
    Thank you for pointing out this typo. I have made the correction in the article.
    David Griffin

    ReplyDelete
  6. @ Anonymous

    Your comment is a bit odd, as it does not appear to contain any original material, but merely republishes Google's policy on Libel, etc.

    One can only assume that you mistakenly believe that something contained in the above article is somehow libelous. I assure you that this is not the case. In fact, in an overabundance of caution, I had the article reviewed by our order's legal advisors prior to publication.
    The above represents an accurate representation of historical facts, including remarks made by William Koon II at Golden State College of SRICF in the presence of numerous material witnesses.

    It is understandable that the SRICF may not be not pleased with Mr. Koon's remarks having reached the ears of the Golden Dawn community. Notwithstanding, the fault for this lies with Mr. Koon himself for ever having made such odd remarks, the implications of which are clearly both alarming and highly relevant to our entire Golden Dawn community.

    David Griffin

    ReplyDelete
  7. David, would you be willing to talk about this post, and some of what it talks about in greater detail.

    I'd like to write something about it, but need to dig a bit deeper.

    Greg/Masonic Traveler
    www/freemasoninformation.com

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks for you comments on the book Origins of the SRIA. The SRIA book I published contains Bruce Wilson's article "The Origin of Our Rosicrucian Society" (1947) and its connection with the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. "The Origins of Scottish Rosicrucianism" by M.W. Frater J.F. Birrell -- an early history, and "The Rosicrucian Society in Europe" by R. W. Felkin -- printed for the first time, as well as the Bristol S.R.I.A. Certificate designed by Benjamin Cox in 1871. I have a larger SRIA book coming out with more material by Wilson and other authors.

    ReplyDelete
  9. @Masonic Traveller
    You are welcome to post your questions here or to write me privately using the "contact us" link at www.golden-dawn.com. For another Golden Dawn perspective on this peculiar incident, you should also see Morgan Eckstein's recent article entitled "Can the SRIA decide what Golden Dawn group is official?" on his Gleamings From The Dawn blog at:
    http://gleamingsfromthedawn.blogspot.com/2011/03/can-sria-decide-what-golden-dawn-group.html

    ReplyDelete
  10. There were many breaks of recognition by the SRIA of the SRICF, but the initial one had absolutely nothing to do with Bruce Wilson's research or its reference by Voorhis. Rather, it had everything to do with No. 1- Harold Voorhis publishing a photo of the English Supreme Magus & No. 2- the English accusations and the American admittance to not working the rituals of their society. This has since changed during the MW Thurman C. Pace Jr.'s year, when the full ritual work of the Society was taken up along with more esoteric research.

    Secondly, anyone who regularly reads R.A. Gilbert's writing or personally converses with him, will tell you that he considers Westcott to be a fantacist at best. He is no fan. He made that abundantly clear when he last spoke in Manhattan in the Fall of 2009.

    ReplyDelete
  11. You say Koon "made claims implying." Specifically what were those claims? Quotes, anybody? Even close paraphrasing?

    ReplyDelete
  12. @ The Burning Temper

    Upon the advice of our order's general counsel, I am unable to publish the exact text of what Mr. Koon said here on this blog, as to do so would cause us to violate a legal agreement involving only the Golden Dawn community.

    The above is an accurate synopsis of events, however, and there are individuals who have already agreed to testify to the exact content of what was said, should it ever prove necessary in court.

    Are you saying that the SRICF presently denies attempting to interfere in the affairs of the Golden Dawn community?

    Deciding not to attempt to interfere in any way whatsoever in the affairs of the Golden Dawn community would be a very wise decision on the part of the SRICF. Perhaps a public statement should be published in a prominent place that the SRICF in no way wishes to interfere in the affairs of the Golden Dawn community. Such a statement would put the matter to rest once and for all.

    In the absence of such a public statement, I can at this juncture only recommend that you seek clarification directly from Mr. Koon. Clearly, he ought to remember what he said, as material witnesses who were present have an extremely clear and precise recollection.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Why did you bring The SM of The SRIA into this Blog?

    Bob Gilbert resigned from The SRIA over 5 years ago

    ReplyDelete
  14. @ Anonymous

    Yes, I had heard that Bob Gilbert had left the SRIA during the ORC schism. That part of this article had originally been written in 1999 and clearly needs to be updated.

    It was actually William Koon II who brought SRIA as well as SRICF into this controversy, by making remarks implying that SRICF and SRIA have governing authority to designate an "official" Golden Dawn order.

    To the Golden Dawn community, this looks like a highly inappropriate attempt by Masonic Rosicrucians to interference in the affairs of the Golden Dawn community.

    ReplyDelete

INTERNATIONAL GRAND TEMPLE OF THE GOLDEN DAWN
FOUNDED BY S.L. MACGREGOR MATHERS - 1892
Ahathöor Mother Temple - Paris, France

Golden Dawn Alchemy and Magic